Constant Domain QuantifiedModal Logics Without Boolean Negation

نویسندگان

  • G R
  • Martin Bunder
  • Greg Restall
  • Bernard Linsky
چکیده

: This paper provides a sound and complete axiomatisation for constant domain modal logics without Boolean negation. This is a simpler case of the difficult problem of providing a sound and complete axiomatisation for constant-domain quantified relevant logics, which can be seen as a kind of modal logic with a twoplace modal operator, the relevant conditional. The completeness proof is adapted from a proof for classical modal predicate logic (I follow James Garson’s presentation of the completeness proof quite closely [10]), but with an important twist, to do with the absence of Boolean negation.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Constant Domain Quanti ed Modal Logics Without Boolean Negation

There is a natural way to add rules for rst-order quanti ers to proof theories for propositional relevant logics, and there is a natural way to add evaluation conditions for quanti ers to the semantics for propositional relevant logics. Kit Fine has shown us that these two natural ways of modelling rst order relevant logics do not match up [6]. Furthermore, Fine has given a semantics for the na...

متن کامل

Negation in Relevant Logics (how I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love the Routley Star)

Negation raises three thorny problems for anyone seeking to interpret relevant logics. The frame semantics for negation in relevant logics involves a `point shift' operator. Problem number one is the interpretation of this operator. Relevant logics commonly interpreted take the inference from A and A _ B to B to be invalid, because the corresponding relevant conditional A ^ (A _ B) ! B is not a...

متن کامل

Displaying and Deciding Substructural Logics 1: Logics with Contraposition

Many logics in the relevant family can be given a proof theory in the style of Belnap's display logic (Belnap 1982). However, as originally given, the proof theory is essentially more expressive than the logics they seek to model. In this paper, we consider a modi ed proof theory which more closely models relevant logics. In addition, we use this proof theory to provide decidability proofs for ...

متن کامل

Negation in Relevant

Negation raises three thorny problems for anyone seeking to interpret relevant logics. The frame semantics for negation in relevant logics involves a `point shift' operator. Problem number one is the interpretation of this operator. Relevant logics commonly interpreted take the inference from A and A _ B to B to be invalid, because the corresponding relevant conditional A ^ (A _ B) ! B is not a...

متن کامل

Residuated fuzzy logics with an involutive negation

Residuated fuzzy logic calculi are related to continuous t-norms, which are used as truth functions for conjunction, and their residua as truth functions for implication. In these logics, a negation is also definable from the implication and the truth constant 0, namely ¬φ isφ → 0. However, this negation behaves quite differently depending on the t-norm. For a nilpotent t-norm (a t-norm which i...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005